nanog mailing list archives
Re: Samsung
From: <david () sparks net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 08:50:26 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Dana Hudes wrote:
Mea maxima culpa and an apology to Samsung and its law firm. I'm a bit too touchy about spam having had quite a bad experience with it as previously described on this list. This explains but does not excuse my firing off without investigating first. I have read the CyberTimes article, which is NOT in today (8/12/97) NY Times (nor yesterday), which I've read completely. I subscribe to the paper edition and read it or skim it daily 7 days (I'm a New Yorker, some say Times subscription is a residency requirement, at least on the Upper West Side :-) ).
To save the few old timers still reading the list ...... What on earth has this to do with nanog? Have we completely given up talking about network operations now? <sigh> --- David ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do!
Current thread:
- Samsung Dana Hudes (Aug 12)
- Re: Samsung robbie (Aug 12)
- Re: Samsung Jon Hartford (Aug 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Samsung Harris Schwartz (Aug 12)
- Samsung Dana Hudes (Aug 12)
- Re: Samsung david (Aug 15)
- Re: Samsung Stephen Dolloff (Aug 15)
- Re: Samsung david (Aug 15)