nanog mailing list archives
Re: [CISCO] directed-broadcast, ip classless
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Personally, I haven't been screaming at anyone. I _have_ been told by cisco that they are reluctant to change the "ip classless" to be default. Stated reason is that folks prefer classful addressing. If cisco ISP folks can speak on the record about this matter to the NANOG list, it would be useful IMHO.
Yes. Insofar as reluctance, its the "principal of least astonsihment" thingamabob. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: ICMP Attacks???????, (continued)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Josh Beck (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Perry E. Metzger (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Josh Beck (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Alex Rubenstein (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Network Admin Account (Aug 15)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Vincent Poy (Aug 15)
- Re: [CISCO] directed-broadcast, ip classless Mark E Larson (Aug 15)
- Message not available
- Re: [CISCO] directed-broadcast, ip classless Ran Atkinson (Aug 14)
- Re: [CISCO] directed-broadcast, ip classless Paul Ferguson (Aug 14)