nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering versus Transit


From: Robert Bowman <rob () elite exodus net>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT)

I think Mr. Simpson was referring to the outbound traffic in this case, not
FULL transit.  Of course you have to manage a way for that traffic's return
packets to find you.  In a lot of ISPs cases, the outbound traffic is a 3:1
ratio.  So if you can dump your outbound traffic onto an unknowing IXP 
member, your probably in luck.  Then just simply order an SMDS connection to
CIX for the return path at ever-so-fast lightspeed.


On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, William Allen Simpson wrote:

Worse, the current technology used at the exchange points could
encourage abuse.  What is to stop anyone connected to an exchange from
simply dumping packets anonymously at the link level into the various
inter-exchange providers' routers and getting free transit?

Typically peers configure their routers so as to keep routes learned via a
peer internal, and not advertised to other peers. Therefore, you _can_
dump all of your traffic to one of your peers, but your traffic will not
come back to you via that same peer, because they are not announcing your
routes to anyone else. Real transit _requires_ that the transit provider
advertise your routes to other providers. Nothing less will work.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: