nanog mailing list archives
Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <c-huegen () quad quadrunner com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 27 Sep 1996, Michael Dillon wrote: ==>If it does, then it is time to get the anti-trust lawyers involved. It's ==>one thing to have a close working relationship with Cisco and to recommend ==>Cisco products, but quite another thing entirely to "require" the use of ==>Cisco products. Wait a minute here. Anti-trust against whom? I don't see any monopoly here, I hear other providers allow you to use other vendors' equipment. You saw Sprint's ops manager just tell Jon that he could use his Bay equipment. /cah - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint, (continued)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Mark Borchers (Sep 26)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Vadim Antonov (Sep 26)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 26)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Neil J. McRae (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Craig A. Haney (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Neil J. McRae (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Michael Dillon (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Avi Freedman (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Neil J. McRae (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Ronald Barron Yokubaitis (Sep 28)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Craig A. Huegen (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Michael Dillon (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Neil J. McRae (Sep 27)
- Re: Advice on dealing with Sprint Neil J. McRae (Sep 28)