nanog mailing list archives
Re: The SWAMP
From: "Bradley Dunn" <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 19:57:00 -0400
Interesting. Well, in that case the rest of the /24 they are in now would have no excuse not to renumber, now would they? :) How would the routes for these /32s get propagated? I assume you'd want them to be announced via BGP, so everyone would have to rewrite their filters to let those routes in. Right? -BD ----------
From: Paul A Vixie <vixie () wisdom home vix com> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: The SWAMP Date: Sunday, September 08, 1996 7:12 PM We have considered assigning a /32 to each root name server and asking everybody in the universe to carry these 10 or so routes in the interest of complete and permanent provider independence. So rather than worry about the /24's ... :-)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The SWAMP, (continued)
- Re: The SWAMP Dorian R. Kim (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Geoff Huston (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Bill Manning (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Work Work Work Bill Manning (Sep 09)
- Re: Work Work Work Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Work Work Work Jon Zeeff (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Jon Zeeff (Sep 09)
- Re: Root Nameserver IPs Zachary DeAquila (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Eric Ziegast (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Perry E. Metzger (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Mathias Koerber (Sep 09)