nanog mailing list archives
Re: RE: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations
From: alex () relcom eu net
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 96 18:50:26 +0300
This is very food example for this subject. What's is the branch of this ING network appear in Moscow (may be they have appeared already - it's not important there). The problem is just the same - if we'll establish peering with this (IGN Russia, having now about 40 customers) this mean for us to provide 2Mbit back-bone over Moscow, SPB and some other places for their customers. I prefere if this IGN Russia bue IP from us (and pay some money - less than for International IP but more than 0.0$). Just as USA's problems but in another scale (2Mbit instead of 150Mbit, 64K instead of 2Mbit, 40 customers instead of 1,000... And this rabbit have a chance to became the wolf, throught (I hope) this oily rabbit can't compete to fast hares in the wild forests).
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > http://www.ibm.com/globalnetwork/inetbbon.htm > > Probably the best kept secret in the Internet world. I just looked at IBMs page and see it as a step foward in peering. They seem to understand that local traffic needs to stay local. Quoting their page, "Within the coming months, we will develop peering with providers in additional countries in order to minimize traffic backhaul between the United States and those countries -- as well as among the countries themselves." Now if others would join in, by keep local traffic local, pick up their network traffic at more points, and be at more peering points, I believe that the network will become better in time.
If we bue IP connection in USA, let's they bue IP connection in Russia too -:). /I am writing for me, not exactly for my company/. And I think our policy is soft in comparation to some other ISP there (in Russia) who don't confess Sprint Russia as ISP even (and they are right!).
I think that it is great that Netrail is opening up a new nap in Atlanta. There should be a nap in every major city in the US and world wide... Back to work now. Christian
--- Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations, (continued)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Vadim Antonov (Oct 25)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Zachary DeAquila (Oct 25)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Jon Zeeff (Oct 26)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Zachary DeAquila (Oct 26)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Zachary DeAquila (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Vadim Antonov (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Vadim Antonov (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Barry Raveendran Greene (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Azeem Azhar (Oct 26)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations William Allen Simpson (Oct 26)
- RE: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Hank Nussbacher (Oct 26)
- RE: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Christian Nielsen (Oct 28)
- Re: RE: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations alex (Oct 28)
- RE: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Christian Nielsen (Oct 28)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jeff Studds (Oct 28)