nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender
From: Jeff Weisberg <jaw () Op Net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:14:26 -0400
| > > This is not the right forum to discuss TCP internals nor is it the right | > > forum to discuss building hardened kernels | | It's in-scope for nanog to the extent that published results and | host-mod procedures are something we may want to pass on to publishers, | but probably some of the TCP/IP newsgroups would be a better place | than nanog. Perhaps inet-access? Inet-access at least has so much | random garbage flowing by that people are used to responding only | to what they are interested in. definately *not* inet-access. alt.pictures.cats.naked would be a better place than "finger-on-'d'key.s0.g0", er inet-access.... --jeff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Leonid Egoshin (Oct 03)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Tim Bass (Oct 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Leonid Egoshin (Oct 03)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Tim Salo (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Tim Bass (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Michael Dillon (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Curtis Villamizar (Oct 07)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Tim Bass (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Jeff Weisberg (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Avi Freedman (Oct 04)
- Re: DoS, ICMP, proxies, SYNDefender Jeff Weisberg (Oct 04)