nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]
From: Jonathan Heiliger <loco () isi net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:03:07 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Dima Volodin wrote: |} Hmmmm, a good idea - make your router to accept packets with src MAC |} addresses of its BGP peers only, no? What about 3rd party routing? People sell legitimate transit at the MAEs and other exchange points. Some have next-hop-self set, some don't. Not to mention the CPU load of the acl to police the MAC addresses. -jh- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy], (continued)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jon Zeeff (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]yy Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Jerry Scharf (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Alex.Bligh (Oct 31)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)