nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd)
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc () apnic net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:47:05 +0900
Hi,
So, my question is: What can we do to make it better? Not "What can Kim Hubbard do to fix it", and not "What can those stupid ISP's do to fix it", but what can both do collaboratively to work out a consistent method of doing things, and making sure that it's well known to both new existing providers of network solutions.
Just FYI: there will be an Internet Address Registry Evolution (yes, we'll be coming up with a new name) working group meeting at the San Jose IETF that is chartered to try to come up with ways of evolving the IP address allocation policies. It will be on Monday at 7:30 PM. Note we aren't touching domain name issues and I'd really like to not have it turn into a "bash your favorite registry" session either. Regards, -drc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Brian Tackett (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Michael Dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) David R. Conrad (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Kim Hubbard (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Kamau Wanguhu (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Kim Hubbard (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Brian Tackett (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Kim Hubbard (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 19)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Ed Jackson (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Bill Woodcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) David R. Conrad (Nov 21)