nanog mailing list archives
Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 00:28:40 -0400
At 09:50 PM 5/24/96 -0400, Jake Khuon wrote:
The RA services at MAE-West were never declared production because we did not have two operational RSes deployed there. The RSes at the other NAPs that have been declared for production were able to sustain a single-machine failure without loss of service.
Let me see if I correctly understand this. The RA services at MAE-West were never declared operational, yet there are service & transit providers using them for production services? If so, this will still be interpreted as a black eye for the RSs. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Michael Dillon (May 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Jake Khuon (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 25)