nanog mailing list archives
Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder)
From: Mike Trest <trest () atmnet net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 12:48:19 -0700
On Mon, 13 May 1996, Mike Trest wrote:I am implementing a CACHE simply to improve on-net customer satisfaction. I expect the operational costs to be much less than the equivilent backbone or transit costs. If it has a side effect of reducting meet point traffic, then the entire net benefits.Doesn't this require reconfiguring the customer's browsers to point at a proxy?
Yes. Initial customer reaction is, at first, hesitant. However, when they try it an see *DRAMTIC* improvements in response times. This is predicated on the "closeness" of the cache relative to dragging the stuff over the whole world. Mike Trest, ATMNET Voice: 619 643-1805 5440 Morehouse Drive Fax: 619 643-1901 San Diego, CA 92121 Pager: 619 960-9070 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Mike Trest (May 13)
- Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Michael Dillon (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Mike Trest (May 13)
- Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Jonathan Heiliger (May 13)
- Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Matthew Kaufman (May 13)
- Re: topological "closeness" (RE: Web o' Wonder) Justin W. Newton (May 13)