nanog mailing list archives

Re: that observation....


From: Surekha Satyam <surekha () ans net>
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 18:02:24 -0400 (EDT)


        I thought so too :) A classic satire. 

        
                                - Surekha



This definately a keeper for the personal archives.  :-)

- paul

At 01:08 PM 5/1/96 -0700, bmanning () ISI EDU wrote:

Forwarded w/o attribution.
(perhaps this is not appropriate but I do feel this way alot... :)
                                            -bill

There are really only <n> discussions on NANOG/CIDRD, which
occasionally flare up like spontaneously combusting drunks on rs-talk,
iepg, and ietf as well.  Herein, a kind of Meta-FAQ, a Field Guide to
the Meta-Wars:




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: