nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 07:22:32 -0500 (EST)
Any NSP that cannot allocate to you at least a /19 worth of networks (IF YOU CAN JUSTIFY IT) is not worth using for an ISP who thinks they need globally routable address space that they can advertise wherever they want sometime in the near future. If you aren't going to get to that point...what's the damn problem?
Except that if you give out /19s to newer ISPs with no allocation/use track record, then the NIC may say "Sorry, you can't get more address space, you haven't been efficiently using what you were given." Avi
Current thread:
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses, (continued)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David C. Kovar (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses com-priv (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul A Vixie (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Nathan Stratton (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dave Siegel (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Andrew Smith (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Avi Freedman (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Andrew Smith (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Avi Freedman (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Scott Mace (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses bmanning (Mar 14)