nanog mailing list archives

Re: RS transparency survey


From: Jessica Yu <jyy () ans net>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 10:03:03 -0500

Jake:

How about doing the following:

By default, insert RS's AS in the path unless otherwise requested by the peer?

There is a RS peer request template which might be a good place to allow
new peers to specify if they want the AS inserted or not.

Please re-insert the RS's AS for the RS peer session with AS690 for now.  

Thanks! 

                                                --Jessica

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: nanog-owner () merit edu 
Received: from interlock (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.2]) by cannes.aa.ans.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA11095 for 
<jyy () cannes aa ans net>; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:07:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from merit.edu by interlock with SMTP id AA11622
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <jyy () ans net>);
  Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:07:17 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.4/merit-2.0) id WAA21066 for nanog-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 
22:00:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from merit.edu (espresso.merit.net [198.108.60.61]) by merit.edu (8.7.4/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id WAA21060 for 
<nanog () Merit Net>; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:00:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199603070300.WAA21060 () merit edu>
From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon () Merit Net>
To: "North American Network Operator's Group Mailing List" <nanog () Merit Net>
Subject: RS transparency survey
Reply-To: khuon () Merit Net (Jake Khuon)
Priority: Normal
X-Uri: http://Espresso.Merit.Net/~khuon/
X-Organisation: Merit Network, Inc.
X-Mailer: MH 6.8.4 #4[UCI] (Espresso.Merit.Net) of Mon Feb 19 15:14:03 EST 1996
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 22:01:52 -0500
Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 890

Some of you may have noticed that the RSes have stopped injecting their ASN
into the ASPath expression.  This was a feature I have just recently turned
on to meet the original design goals of the project.   As per specification,
the RSes were to be transparent in its operation.

I realise I may have erred by doing this without asking the community first. 
Therefore, I would like to take a poll as to what everyone prefers.  I can
turn the ASN injection back on in a peer-by-peer basis if necessary.  I
sincerely apologise if this has caused any confusions and/or problems.


- --
/*====================[ Jake Khuon <khuon () Merit Net> ]=====================+
 | Systems Research Programmer, IE Group       /| /|[~|)|~|~ N E T W O R K |
 | Vox: (313) 763-4907   Fax: (313) 747-3185  / |/ |[_|\| |   Incorporated |
 +==[ Suite C2122, Bldg. 1  4251 Plymouth Rd.  Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2785 ]==*/

------- End of Forwarded Message



Current thread: