nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
From: Dorian Kim <dorian () cic net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:14:45 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 13 Mar 1996, Michael Dillon wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, David R. Conrad wrote:Bullshit. The InterNIC is very much aware of global routing issues.Then why have they not yet come up with a workable policy like the one RIPE uses to release /16 blocks incrementally to new ISP's?
Well, currently InterNIC is the registry of last resort, and given RFC 1814 and such, they CANNOT, if you fight hard enough, turn you away. Given the number of new ISPs that come to them for provider independent addresses, they isn't enough IPv4 address space to do the above with. -dorian
Current thread:
- Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Jeremy Porter (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Matt Zimmerman (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses nelson (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Perry E. Metzger (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Barry Shein (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Allocation of IP Addresses Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 13)