nanog mailing list archives

Re: MCI [ATM overhead]


From: jogden () merit edu (Jeff Ogden)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 14:36:09 -0500

I don't think you can look at bandwidth without also looking at cost.  If
the cost for an OC-3 is less than the cost for two DS3s, ...

   -Jeff Ogden
    Merit


At 9:26 AM 3/21/96, Shikhar Bajaj wrote:
I.e. a dual clearline DS-3 actually carries as much user data as OC-3c ATM.
Which, incidentally, was why SprintLink backbone design is easily expandable
to dual links (that includes carefully considering implications for
routing).
Sean presented that design on NANOG a year ago, BTW.  Funny thing, the design
is expandable beyond that, too, so OC-3 ATM is already obsolete.

--vadim


If OC-3 is obsolete, what does that make DS-1s and DS-3s?


Shikhar




Current thread: