nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 09:58:48 -0500
At 09:09 AM 3/18/96 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
BTW, there are 'rumours' floating around that China wants a couple of A's or so...
There is also a train of thought that China should simply use RFC-1918 addressing and some type of network address translation, since they control explicit points of entry & exit to the global Internet from/to the country, and are determined to isolate themselves from the remainder of the Internet community anyway. But I digress. - paul
Current thread:
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses, (continued)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Barry James (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 15)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Perry E. Metzger (Mar 15)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Robert Moskowitz (Mar 15)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses @NANOG-LIST (Mar 15)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 16)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 17)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 18)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 18)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Robert Moskowitz (Mar 18)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Curtis Villamizar (Mar 19)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 15)