nanog mailing list archives

Re: MAE-West is up again ( RA Contract Value )


From: Warren Williams <wkwilli () PacBell COM>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 17:15:56 -0700

At 06:08 PM 6/2/96 -0400, you wrote:
gee bill, accusing AVI of muck raking?  must have been confusing him with
me....

i think his question is very relevant......

how bout phrasing it differently?  if ameritech, pac bell, mfs, or sprint
were
initially clueless (greedy?) enough to ask for $60,000 a month I can see
why you might like to decline to embarrass the offender.... - *IF* such
entity has become more reasonable in the meantime.

so let me rephrase avi's question:

what is the RA paying each NAP owner now??  this should be publicly
disclosable since it is paying with federal funds.  Right?  seems to me
the important question is whether anyone is out of line NOW.

Since I've been involved with the NAP project at Pacific Bell, the RA has
only been charged for an ATM port ($4,850 mo. flat). There has been no
charge for the facilities in which the servers are housed, for reserved rack
space, for power, access, whatever... 

Bill and I have been in discussion about a way to reduce the ATM access fees
considerably, and that is merely waiting for some clearance (which I thought
would come *much* faster) on my side of the house.   Our mission (already
accepted, Mr. Phelps) is to reduce the charge to zero.
Kind regards,
Warren

-------------------------------------------------------------------
      Warren K. Williams, Director - Network Access Point
        Pacific Bell Business Communications Services
      Email: wkwilli () pacbell com   Phone: 510.867.9065  
-------------------------------------------------------------------

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: