nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc () apnic net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 11:03:53 +0000
Brian,
My view is still that charging for routing announcements is necessary and sufficient -
Sufficient for what?
but as I've said before, I think that registries should charge for their *services*, and allocating an address block is a service.
What is the difference in the service charge for allocating a /8 compared to allocating a /24?
So I don't think we're that far apart.
You're in Switzerland, I'm in Japan... Cheers, -drc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Curtis Villamizar (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 04)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Michael Dillon (Jun 03)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Mike Norris (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 18)