nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 96 12:44:47 PDT
Owen,
From my (admittedly biased) perspective, it would seem there are twooptions: A) The socalist approach B) The capitalist approachAnd, generally, I would have to say that for a resource such as IP addresses and Internet registration services, option A is certainly better suited to the task at hand.
Why option A is "certainly better suited" ?
Every time someone (who me?) brings up option B, we go chasing merrily down one or more of the following ratholes: 1) we need to conserve route table space, lets charge for that, not addresses (irrelevant)Not irrelevant. Highly relevant, but not the right solution to that problem either.
Why this is not "the right solution" ?
2) AT&T (or some other evil speculator) will buy up all the address space (and ISPs are just going to sit idly by?)Depending on the situation, it might be difficult for them to do anything effective about it. It is a real danger, and could easily occur.
Why do you think this is "a real danger, and could easily occur" ? Yakov. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 17)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Kim Hubbard (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Gopi K Garge (Jun 18)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 18)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 18)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Jon Zeeff (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Yakov Rekhter (Jun 17)
- IP addresses for sale? Michael Dillon (Jun 18)