nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routing flaps, was Re: Ping flooding


From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc () imach com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 10:17:11 -0600 (MDT)

On Fri, 12 Jul 1996, Paul Ferguson wrote:

I'm sorry, but I'm afraid that you're missing the point here.

In most larger ISP backbones, the behavior of their IGP is indeed
visible to the public, since in most instances, most of the Internet
traffic relies on the stability of these interior (an esoteric term)
networks. Therefore, whether interior or exterior flap is really of
no relevance in this context.

<This isn't intended to irritate, I just want to make sure I understand 
this correctly>

Let me try a very simple example:



   To Internet     To Internet  <-- Peering points or upstreams  
    'Point A'       'Point B'
        |               |
  +-----------+   +-----------+
  | Router A  |---| Router B  | 
  +-----------+   +-----------+
        |               |
        |               |
  +-----------+   +-----------+
  | Router C  |   | Router D  |
  +-----------+   +-----------+
        |               |
  To Downstream    To Downstream
 Non-BGP (Static) Non-BGP (Static)
    Customer        Customer


Routers A & B are running BGP to the outside world, and iBGP between them.
Routers C & D are 'defaulted' into A and B.

If the link between A&B dies the Exterior Routes will (and should) flap.

If the link between either A or B and the Internet dies, the Exterior 
Routes will (and should) flap.

If the line between routers A&C or B&D or between either C or D and their 
respective static downstreams die, there should be NO external route 
flap.  However, if C&D are incapable of 'Null0' routing, it may be 
beneficial to run dynamic routing between A&C and between B&D so that 
A&B discard packets instead of causing a routing loop.  This "internal 
routing flap" should not be visible to the outside world.

I think that's what I meant to say before.  Sometimes I'm not too clear 
about what I'm saying.  If I've still missed the boat feel free to let me 
know :) 

-forrestc () imach com


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: