nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 07:24:44 PST
Daniel,
If you insist on prefix-length filtering I have proposed a soloution for future address space allocated via the RIPE NCC several times: - set your inbound prefix length filter to /19. - The RIPE NCC will *guarantee* that we will not make more than 1024 non-aggregateable allocations from each /8.
Would the RIPE NCC provide such non-aggregatable allocations irrespective of how many hosts would be covered by such an allocation ? Yakov.
Current thread:
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations, (continued)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Kim Hubbard (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations from cais.com (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Kim Hubbard (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations from cais.com (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Tony Li (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations from cais.com (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Tony Li (Jan 27)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 26)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 27)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Yakov Rekhter (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Havard . Eidnes (Jan 27)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 27)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 26)