nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 1996 07:52:26 -0500
Hocus Pocus. A NAT solves this problem. :-) - paul At 08:12 AM 2/5/96 -0700, Tan Chang Hu wrote:
If you have a class B and use a firewall, then a /27 should be more than is needed on the global Internet and they should use an address from RFC1597 internally and return the /16. HankHank, Depending on the firewall design, hosts located behind firewalls can conceivably access the Internet directly for certain services and in this case unique addresses are required. Your assumption would be valid when all traffic for that site is handled by proxy servers. -- T. C. Hu | tchu () sandia gov Sandia National Laboratories | Tel: (505) 845-8936 P.O.Box 5800 | FAX: (505) 844-2067 Albuquerque, NM 87111-0807 |
-- Paul Ferguson || || Consulting Engineering || || Reston, Virginia USA |||| |||| tel: +1.703.716.9538 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. e-mail: pferguso () cisco com c i s c o S y s t e m s
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations, (continued)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Sean Donelan (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Edward Henigin (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations from cais.com (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Stan Barber (Feb 03)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Hank Nussbacher (Feb 03)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Tan Chang Hu (Feb 05)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations David Miller (Feb 04)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Alan Hannan (Feb 05)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Vince Fuller (Feb 05)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Paul Ferguson (Feb 07)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Paul Ferguson (Feb 07)