nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exchanges that matter...
From: "Joe Rhett" <joe () Navigist Com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 02:55:21 -0800 (PST)
It is actually quite hard in practice to push a FDDI switch into trouble, although theoretically it should be simple, modulo the interesting effects that token-withholding can produce.
Hm. Not sure what you mean. FDDI can certainly be over-utilized, that's not hard. On the other hard, FDDI doesn't fall down and die like Ethernet does when congested.
In practice, the limiting factor will tend to be the per-port bandwidth rather than the aggregate bandwidth. One would have
Bingo. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Exchanges that matter..., (continued)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Bill Sommerfeld (Dec 05)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 05)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Tim Salo (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Scott Huddle (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Jim Dixon (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Alex.Bligh (Dec 07)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Dave O'Shea (Dec 06)
- RE: Exchanges that matter... Danny Stroud (Dec 06)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Vadim Antonov (Dec 07)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Joe Rhett (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Stephen Stuart (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Jonathan Heiliger (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Matthew Petach (Dec 09)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Avi Freedman (Dec 09)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Nathan Stratton (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Stephen Stuart (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 08)
- Re: Exchanges that matter... Jeremy Porter (Dec 08)