nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet?
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk () bbnplanet com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 20:02:38 -0500 (EST)
My mistake, I meant flow.durations for ISMA in Feb...its at: http://www.ipsilon.com/staff/pn/papers/isma96.htmlInteresting. It appears that interface based switching by IP flow problem is a simplification of the ATM connection switching by IP flow problem.
You might want to read the report of that came out of the ISMA workshop. See http://www.nlanr.net/ISMA/Report/. http://www.nlanr.net/Flowsresearch/ also has quite a bit of useful stuff. --jhawk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet?, (continued)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Chris Caputo (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Chris A. Icide (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Vadim Antonov (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Mike Leber (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Jonathan Heiliger (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Paul A Vixie (Dec 15)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Chris Caputo (Dec 15)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Paul A Vixie (Dec 15)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Mike Leber (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? Mike Leber (Dec 14)
- Re: Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet? John Hawkinson (Dec 14)