nanog mailing list archives
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
From: "Jim J. Steinhard" <jjs () sprint net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 19:40:28 -0400 (EDT)
Randy, I'm not sure we can provide the type of quantitative data your looking for but we can discuss/present qualitative measures we are taking to improve interconnectivity (i.e. more bandwidth). Jim On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Randy Bush wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 96 11:37 PDT From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> To: "Susan R. Harris" <srh () merit edu> Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Agenda for next NANOGAre there other topics you'd like to hear about?How about Analysis of Actual End to End Performance accross the NAPs/MAEs To be given by each operator? (as opposed to "everything is wonderful because we dropped no packets across ten feet of level-2 wire") randy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Agenda for next NANOG Susan R. Harris (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Jim J. Steinhard (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Dorian R. Kim (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Alan Hannan (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Jim J. Steinhard (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Vince Fuller (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Havard . Eidnes (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Stan Barber (Aug 30)