nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer AS
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 22:34:09 -0700
What Sprint's policy is actually meant to do is to discourage customers^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^from multi-homing to other providers. What their policy actually does is^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is not a bad thing in itself.
That depends on who you are and how important your network connectivity is. Clearly if someone has a business plan that calls for their packets to be carried "hot, live" by two different worldwide IP carriers, neither of those can be SprintLink. If I were SprintLink I would think this was a bad thing. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Customer AS Tim Crowell (Aug 15)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Customer AS Chris MacFarland (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Sean Doran (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Paul Ferguson (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Dorian R. Kim (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Paul A Vixie (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Sean Doran (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Henry Kilmer (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Jon Zeeff (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Avi Freedman (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Sean Doran (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Henry Kilmer (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 17)
- Re: Customer AS Avi Freedman (Aug 17)