nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers

From: bmanning () isi edu
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 11:19:22 -0700 (PDT)

(2) Could anyone share opinions/facts regarding why organizations may or 
may not exchange routes via the Route Servers rather than direct peering 
relationships at the NAPs?


        I know of no case where an organization "may not" exchange routes
        with the Route Servers.

-- 
--bill

Current thread:

Peering Policies and Route Servers Ali Marashi (Apr 29)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers bmanning (Apr 29)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Ali Marashi (Apr 29)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Nathan Stratton (Apr 29)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers M. Christopher Davies (Apr 29)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Nathan Stratton (Apr 29)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Jeff Young (Apr 30)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Matt Zimmerman (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Michael Dillon (Apr 29)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Nathan Stratton (Apr 29)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Matt Zimmerman (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Enke Chen (Apr 30)

(Thread continues...)