nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routes and routing tables


From: Robert Bowman <rob () elite exodus net>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT)

There is a HUGE problem with regards to this.  When I look at "certain" 
providers and the way they are advertising, this is very common:

206.79.0.0/16
206.79.108.0/24
206.79.224.0/22

etc etc.

They are advertising their 16 right, and then are putting more specific 
routes in afterwards.  Doesn't make much sense, however I can see certain
situations why it is happening.. 

In certain circumstances, the people will advertise every class C in a /16 as
well as advertising the /16.  It's turned into something worse than pre-CIDR.


The above addresses are Exodus Communications.  I don't want to turn this 
into a pointing of fingers thread.

Robert Bowman
Sr. Hole Plugger
Exodus Communications Inc.
rob () exodus net
(408) 522-8473


As I think we are done talking about DNS, I have been looking at our
routing tables as of late. I am seeing that many providers with
blocks of address space do not aggregate the addresses. I think that if
this is so, there needs to be something done to fix it. 

Once again, we are not even getting a full BGP table and know that if I
see problems on a smaller scale, their most be more of these problems out
there.

thanks


Christian Nielsen
Vyzynz International Inc.       cnielsen () vii com,CN46,KB7HAP
Phone 801-568-0999              Fax 801-568-0953
Private Email - Christian () Nielsen Net   BOFH - cnielsen () one dot PS :)





Current thread: