nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address "portability"
From: avg () postman ncube com (Vadim Antonov)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 14:36:41 +0800
From: matthew () scruz net (Matthew Kaufman)
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se> Give me a call when you convinced the phone_company to make my phone number work in California.
The California PUC has approved local phone competition within California, with the requirement the phone number portability (between carriers) be fully implemented as soon as possible. Making your phone number stay the same no matter whether you're a PacBell or MFS or TCI customer is exactly the same problem as making IP addresses portable... just wait until ISPs are regulated, and they get the same mandate.
-matthew kaufman matthew () scruz net
Which only shows how stupid American elected representatives are. (No, i do not think they are any smarter in any other country). --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Address "portability" Peter Lothberg (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" bmanning (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Address "portability" Erik-Jan Bos (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Mike O'Dell (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Andrew Smith (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jerry Scharf (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Vadim Antonov (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Justin W. Newton (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Paul Ferguson (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jeremy Porter (Apr 05)