nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering long prefixes
From: hwb () upeksa sdsc edu (Hans-Werner Braun)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 7:26:40 PDT
Just an aside (since I just have the data handy), as of a few weeks ago, the InterNIC data base had the following prefix counts for their network number entries: PREFIX FREQUENCY ========== ========= -536870912 1 3 2 7 1 8 78 9 12 10 22 11 23 12 39 13 50 14 81 15 47 16 9057 17 260 18 583 19 1066 20 1870 21 2197 22 2335 23 2721 24 64386 31 86 I sure am liking those 31 bit masks.
Current thread:
- filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Geert Jan de Groot (Sep 21)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Nick Williams (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes John Bradley (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Willi Huber (Sep 26)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Dave Siegel (Sep 22)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Michael Dillon (Sep 21)
(Thread continues...)