nanog mailing list archives
Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
From: Elliot Alby <ealby () sprint net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 12:40:50 -0400 (EDT)
I must have missed the correction - thanks. 206.82.160/22 is now being routed on ANSnet.
argh, thanks for pointing that out. the owner of 204.82.160 is a downstream cust of mine. coincidently, i just got mail from belcom (who have 204.82.160), and a separate route object is on the way. (i was WONDERING why someone would want us sending a route object on an mci cust..) - elliot/sprint
Current thread:
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible, (continued)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Andrew Partan (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Dave Israel (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Kai (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Andrew Partan (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Ed Kern (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Mark Davisson (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Elliot Alby (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Curtis Villamizar (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Andrew Partan (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Mark Davisson (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Elliot Alby (Sep 27)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Andrew Partan (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Andrew Partan (Sep 24)
- Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible Gordon Cook (Sep 25)