nanog mailing list archives
Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF
From: "Robert Raisch, The Internet Company" <raisch () internet com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:31:15 -0400
Paul, none of the suggestions I have seen so far (in more than five years) offer something which 1. is an effective solution, 2. is technologically possible, and 3. places the burden of blame on the perpetrator. If you can propose a solution which does not imply: ...imaginary technology to intuit a commercial message from its content (can anyone say "content based routing"? ;) ...making the management of the affected resources more rigorous than current practice ...punishing the ISP for the actions of its customers ...complex or impossible deployment issues ...added administrative cost I and many others would LOVE to hear about it. I am the first to agree with Shakespere on the value of certain members of the legal profession. This time, however, I do not see any recourse. Do you? </rr> On 16 Oct 95 at 9:40, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Eek. Do you _really_ want to get a bunch of shyster lawyers involved? I would think that there must be any number of more platable courses of action than this... My $.02.
-- The Internet Company - info () internet com We Bring Only Value to the Global Internet
Current thread:
- Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF Robert Raisch, The Internet Company (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF bmanning (Oct 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF Robert Raisch, The Internet Company (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: Legislative Relief Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)