nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing wars pending?
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3 () is chrysler com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 12:09:09 -0500
At 08:22 PM 11/15/95 -0500, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Consider process migration.Any commercial OS out there which does process migration? Most OS people became quite convinced that process migration does not pay for itself.
Vadim, In many areas you and Noel know a lot more than me. You are the eagles, I am only a hawk. But over in corporate networks, we have had much of this for years. In VTAM. Yes sessions do not survive rollovers, but reconnects go immediately to the new system. We have WORKED VERY HARD trying to manage this in DNS. Notify has helped and Dynamic will help more. But that is for host, not process. So we have to have multiple A records for different names and that breaks in-addr.arpa! GRRRRR...... Talk to my at Dallas and I will give you living examples of BBBIIIGGG mobile processes VERY mission critical..... Enough. I got to head over to the AIAG office. Talk to me about that also at Dallas. Robert Moskowitz Chrysler Corporation (810) 758-8212
Current thread:
- Re: Routing wars pending?, (continued)
- Re: Routing wars pending? @NANOG-LIST (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Sean Doran (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Robert Elz (Nov 15)
- Routing wars pending? Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Robert Elz (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Vadim Antonov (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Tony Li (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Sean Doran (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Vadim Antonov (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Noel Chiappa (Nov 15)
- Re: Routing wars pending? ser-rr (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Robert Moskowitz (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Tim Bass (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Michael A. Patton (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? @NANOG-LIST (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Tim Bass (Nov 16)
- Re: Routing wars pending? Tim Salo (Nov 16)