nanog mailing list archives
Re: PI vs PA Address Space
From: jerry () mid net (Jerry Anderson)
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 21:10:19 -0500 (CDT)
nothing longer than /18 or /19 (it's /18 now, but it's not entirely inflexible, and dialogues continue) will have global scope.
As an aside, is anyone else besides Sprint behind this /18 model?
Why /18? Is there reasoning or research behind this choice? In Danvers I believe the metric "implemented hosts per routing table entry" was mentioned. -- jerry () mid net Jerry Anderson, Network Engineer MIDnet Network Operations Center (402) 472-0241 201 N 8th, Suite 421 (402) 472-0240 [fax] Lincoln NE 68508
Current thread:
- PI vs PA Address Space Daniel Karrenberg (May 17)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Mike Norris (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- PI vs PA Address Space Daniel Karrenberg (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Sean Doran (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Karl Denninger, MCSNet (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael Dillon (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Peter Berger (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Jerry Anderson (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael F. Nittmann (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Jerry Anderson (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space David R Conrad (May 19)
- PI vs PA Address Space Daniel Karrenberg (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space peter (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael F. Nittmann (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 20)