nanog mailing list archives
Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc
From: Paul Mockapetris <pvm () ISI EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 May 95 11:01:30 PDT
when is this problem solved? with ipv6?No, the problem is solved, just not widely deployed. There is no requirement to delegate on octet bounds anymore. -- --bill
If we are talking about the DNS issue, I would like to read about the solution. Where is it? paul USC/Information Sciences Institute phone: 310-822-1511 x285 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA fax: 310-823-6714 90292
Current thread:
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc, (continued)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Juha Heinanen (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Chris Chaundy (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vadim Antonov (May 18)
- Draft internic ip allocation doc Daniel Karrenberg (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul A Vixie (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Sean Doran (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Ferguson (May 20)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Geoff Huston (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc peter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Jeremy Porter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Peter Kline (May 19)