nanog mailing list archives
Re: loose source route
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 11:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Source routing is dangerous. Hoever, i see no harm to allow source routing for a particular type of packets (for example, for ICMP echo requests). Cisco? Are you there? --vadim
So are tunnels. Both have a place however. -- --bill
Current thread:
- loose source route C. Philip Wood (Mar 24)
- Re: loose source route Paul Ferguson (Mar 24)
- Re: loose source route roy alcala (Mar 24)
- Re: loose source route Matt Mathis (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: loose source route Vadim Antonov (Mar 27)
- Re: loose source route Paul Traina (Mar 27)
- Re: loose source route bmanning (Mar 27)
- Re: loose source route Chris Dorsey (510)422-4474 (Mar 30)
- Re: loose source route Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 30)
- Re: loose source route Chris Dorsey (510)422-4474 (Mar 30)
- Re: loose source route Curtis Villamizar (Mar 30)
- Re: loose source route Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 30)
- Re: loose source route Paul Ferguson (Mar 24)