nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Dave Siegel <dsiegel () net99 net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:01:14 -0700 (MST)
On Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:30:19 +0200 (MET DST) you said:Simon Poole wrote:Yakov, if you have data that CIDR is -not- working for new allocations please present it here. SimonCIDR doesn't work as it should. We had to inject all of the more specifics of 194.45/16 cause Sprintlink isn't able to handle CIDR routes correctly.Can someone explain this a bit more? This sounds like a showstopper for CIDR.
I have noticed some similar problems. MCI routing breaks if you provide them with an identical path at multiple interconnects if it is advertised to them at equal cost, hence they always like to see MEDs. The most straight forward way to solve the problem is to announce more specific's, like you say. It's not the only solution, but it's one. Dave -- Dave Siegel Director of Engineering, Net99 http://www.webcity.com/ (602)249-1083 24x7 NOC line http://www.rtd.com/~dsiegel/ (520)318-0696 My Tucson Office
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Ruediger Volk (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ David J. Schmidt (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ David J. Schmidt (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Ruediger Volk (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Gary Wright (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 18)