nanog mailing list archives
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
From: "Steven J. Richardson" <sjr () merit edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 22:45:02 -0400
FYI: > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:50:17 -0400 > From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net> > To: Hank Nussbacher <HANK () taunivm tau ac il> > CC: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>, Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se>, nanog () merit edu > You might be better off directing a default route at your primary > provider, though aiming at 140.222 won't make much difference from a > distance in the topology. We are aware of the widespread use of > 140.222 among smaller providers. Unlike 129.40 (the former T1 ^^^^^^ I believe that this was 129.140. > backbone, later reassigned to IBM Kingston), 140.222 is not being > shutdown. > Curtis Steve R.
Current thread:
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?, (continued)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 18)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? elliot (Apr 18)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 18)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? David Comay (Apr 18)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Steven J. Richardson (Apr 19)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 18)
- Has PSI been assigned network 1? Daniel Karrenberg (Apr 20)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 18)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Eric M. Carroll (Apr 19)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Michael F. Nittmann (Apr 18)