nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why Vadim likes statics


From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 22:09:03 -0400


In message <199504242150.AA14892 () zed isi edu>, bmanning () ISI EDU writes:

ACtually, I like Eric's reply.   Making pullup "distance" sensitive
sounds like a big win.

-- 
--bill


I think combining AS path length and prefix length might be a good
idea.  Long prefixes and long AS paths better be very stable or they
get held down (not held up, but down).  The document and code that I
half wrote a long time ago supported the notion of multiple sets of
configured decay rate parameters though I didn't think of choosing
parameter on this sort of basis.

Thanks Eric for the comment.

Curtis


Current thread: