nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why Vadim likes statics
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 22:09:03 -0400
In message <199504242150.AA14892 () zed isi edu>, bmanning () ISI EDU writes:
ACtually, I like Eric's reply. Making pullup "distance" sensitive sounds like a big win. -- --bill
I think combining AS path length and prefix length might be a good idea. Long prefixes and long AS paths better be very stable or they get held down (not held up, but down). The document and code that I half wrote a long time ago supported the notion of multiple sets of configured decay rate parameters though I didn't think of choosing parameter on this sort of basis. Thanks Eric for the comment. Curtis
Current thread:
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Vadim Antonov (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics bmanning (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Curtis Villamizar (Apr 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Sean Doran (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Hank Nussbacher (Apr 25)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics bmanning (Apr 24)