nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comments
From: Stephen Wolff <steve () nsf gov>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 1994 09:37:41 -0500 (EDT)
So long as ALL NSPs agree to peer at MAE-East then things should be OK, as no transit is needed because all the regionals are connected by their individual service provider. However there is no REQUIREMENT to peer. I am looking for NSF to make this a requirement (at least for a year or so) to ensure continued ubiquitous connectivity.
It **IS** a requirement of NSF - if you connect to any NAP, but not if you connect to MAE-East, the CIX, the GIX, the SWAB or the Dundalk Consolidated International Three Hundred Baud Interconnect (local reference). The NSF-sponsored NAPs are the only places where we have the right to shape policy. -s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Comments, (continued)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Matt Mathis (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 02)
- Comments Tony Li (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Peter Dawe (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments bmanning (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 02)
- Re: Comments Peter Dawe (Sep 05)
- Re: Comments Gordon Cook (Sep 05)
- Re: Comments Peter Dawe (Sep 06)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 07)
- Re: Comments Peter Dawe (Sep 07)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 07)
- Re: Comments Gordon Cook (Sep 07)
- Re: Comments Peter S. Ford (Sep 07)
- Re: Comments Gordon Cook (Sep 08)
- Re: Comments Matt Mathis (Sep 08)
- Re: Comments Peter S. Ford (Sep 09)
- Re: Comments Aaron Nabil (Sep 09)
- Re: Comments Louis A. Mamakos (Sep 09)
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Sep 10)