nanog mailing list archives
Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database
From: epg () merit edu
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 11:37:00 EDT
Bill,
Bill Manning writes: Actually, I was hoping to keep the data in the local rWhois database and then try batch loading into the RRDB as needed. I think that rWhois may be a better way to keep local data current/correct. Seems to scale better. What are your thoughts?
Sounds like a good way to locally maintain information and to keep the routing registry information current at least for the time being. Not sure which scaling issue you think this solves. --Elise - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Steven J. Richardson (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Steven J. Richardson (May 06)
- Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Steven J. Richardson (May 09)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database William Manning (May 09)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Steven J. Richardson (May 09)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database William Manning (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database epg (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database William Manning (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Daniel Karrenberg (May 10)
- way past "additions to the NSFnet PRDB" William Manning (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Mark Kosters (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database William Manning (May 10)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database William Manning (May 09)
- Re: Additions to the NSFNET policy-based routing database Enke Chen (May 12)