Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: SNMP testing


From: Spring Systems <korund () hotmail com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:42:09 +0000


SNMP Scanner, sure, check port 161. If scan with nmap UBR's private IP address range  10.xxx.xxx.xxx on a cable system 
out off the sub-net , nmap doesn't show anything, report show no open ports or device is offile. The scanning on cable 
system is possible only from inside the sub-net? All devices is online and have 80 port open, there is web-interface. 

Subject: Re: [framework] SNMP testing
From: carlos_perez () darkoperator com
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:18:43 -0400
CC: hviniciusg () gmail com; framework () spool metasploit com
To: korund () hotmail com



did you UDP Scan for port 161? if not present then SNMP is not enabled, to enable SNMP the service must be install by 
the server administrator and configured with a community string. 
On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Spring Systems wrote:I scanned node with standalone SNMP Scanner utility, it doesn't 
return anything: does this mean SNMP is just disabled or this mean that community string changed from default string to 
another string?

If SNMP just disabled, is it possible to use a DoS attack, like Buffer Overflow Attacks, SYN attack, Teadrop Attack, 
Smurf attack, which should cause rebooting and enabling snmp?

Regards,

Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:40:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [framework] SNMP testing
From: hviniciusg () gmail com
To: korund () hotmail com
CC: framework () spool metasploit com

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Spring Systems <korund () hotmail com> wrote:
Is there still possibility to exploit/test SNMP devices with Metasploit if SNMP is disabled on target devices
If the SNMP service is disabled, then you could not exploit anithing
 
, or if community string changed from default "public" to another string?

If the community string is changed, there are several tools to "brute force" the community string, but it makes a lot 
of noise, and there are some devices that will block you when there are several failed attempts, but if this is a last 
resort option, then i think you should doit, or leave this test to the end of the audit process. 

Regards,
Hugo Vinicius Garcia Razera _______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

                                          
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

Current thread: