Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode?
From: John Nash <rootsecurityfreak () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:30:39 +0530
sorry, i should have mentioned the purpose was AV evasion ... Ok let me through a use case at you: 1. Exe A was encoded using msfencode ..... was detected by AV X 2. Exe A was then packed with Upx .... was not detected by AV X have you ever encountered a scenario like this? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Rob Fuller <mubix () room362 com> wrote:
If there is a reason to. I have not had need to, in my personal experience. -- Rob Fuller | Mubix Certified Checkbox Unchecker Room362.com | Hak5.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:12 AM, John Nash <rootsecurityfreak () gmail com>wrote:Is it worthwhile to pack executables produced by msfpayload or using msfencoder? can someone share their experience? jn _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode? John Nash (Sep 12)
- Re: Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode? Rob Fuller (Sep 13)
- Re: Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode? John Nash (Sep 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode? archeldeeb (Sep 13)
- Re: Packing an Exe produced using msfpayload and msfencode? Rob Fuller (Sep 13)