Re: Payloads and Pivoting!

[John Nash <rootsecurityfreak () gmail com>]

Thanks for all the replies to my previous email.

Any answers for this one?

I guess, as V cannot reach A directly, it has to hop via P, and hence port
forwarding on P seems to be the only option to make reverse connects work.
Am i right?

Vivek has posted some vids on this in one of the links i sent before ... but
its not very clear .....

someone please clarify ....



On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:12 PM, John Nash <rootsecurityfreak () gmail com>wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Was just trying to exploit hosts further beyond on the network using
> Pivoting:
>
> here is how the scenarios looks like:
>
> (A) --------------------------> (P) ----------------------------> (V)
>
> A - Attacker
> P- Pivot machine
> V - victim I wanna exploit
>
> Now when I use a payload like meterpreter/bind_tcp on V, it works great!
> but when I use a Reverse Connect Materpreter payload it does not work as (V)
> cannot reach (A) directly.
>
> is the only option here to set a port forward on (P) to have the
> reverse_connect work?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JN
>
> p.s late night hacking + metasploit + coffee ....... what could be a better
> combo? :)
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework