Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary
From: Tod Beardsley <todb () planb-security net>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:26:41 -0500
Robin Wood asked:
The only mixin I'm using is Msf::Exploit::Capture which I need for packet sniffing. Is it right that RHOST is a mandatory field for this mixin?
RHOST is indeed mandatory -- check lib/msf/core/option_container.rb , under @@builtin_opts; Opt::RHOST is defined here (as a required option). However, like egypt mentioned, you can still deregister it. In fact, I just did for a similar module, auxiliary/test/capture -- this is a passive listener that doesn't need an RHOST, so as of r9027, RHOST is now explicitly deregistered for that module. The Msf::Exploit::Capture mixin got reworked somewhat recently so it's responsible for both "capture" functionality as well as "inject" functionality -- which, for most modules that used it, you'd want to require an RHOST. This is probably why you suddenly started getting nagged about a missing RHOST. -tod _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary HD Moore (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary egypt (Apr 05)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Tod Beardsley (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary Robin Wood (Apr 06)
- Re: RHOST is now a mandatory field for an auxilary HD Moore (Apr 05)