Metasploit mailing list archives

what about someone ports all exploits from Milw0rm over to metasploit?


From: hattrickinc at gmail.com (Nicholas Harvey)
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 00:23:43 -0500

Plus.. I was always taught that they don't compile on purpose- to weed  
out the noobs?

Sent from my hacked iPhone

On Mar 7, 2009, at 12:08 AM, H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote:

On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 13:48 +1000, Professor 0110 wrote:
I just had an idea that maybe Metasploit could have a dedicated team
that ports all the exploits from Milw0rm over to the Metasploit
Platform. That way, Metasploit can become a "fully functional"  
exploit
platform and the ULTIMATE Penetration Testing/Hacking tool. I say  
this
because a lot of the C/Perl exploits from Milw0rm don't compile in
their default state.

Many of these exploits and proof of concepts require quite a bit of  
work
to port. For example, Every metasploit module contains information  
about
the maximum payload size, the restricted characters, and often
target-specific information for a wide range of versions. To port a
proof of concept, you essentially have to rewrite the code from  
scratch
and do the work that the PoC author didn't bother with. Without  
knowing
the payload size, the restricted characters, and the return time,  
these
become time intensive to convert. This doesn't take into account the
difficulty in finding copies of the original, vulnerable software.

I would love to port as many as possible, but its usually only worth  
the
effort for important/wide-spread vulnerabilities.

-HD

_______________________________________________
http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework



Current thread: