Information Security News mailing list archives

Is SSL Cert Holder ID Verification A Joke?


From: InfoSec News <alerts () infosecnews org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:03:50 -0600 (CST)

http://www.darkreading.com/authentication/167901072/security/news/232500346/is-ssl-cert-holder-id-verification-a-joke.html

By Ericka Chickowski
Contributing Editor
Dark Reading
Jan 24, 2012

With the release of the BEAST exploit and subsequent scrambling by browser vendors to close up vulnerabilities against SSL authentication, many Web authentication discussions have been focused on the SSL/TLS protocol’s weaknesses in recent months. As some IT professionals explain, though, some of the biggest problems with SSL have nothing to do with the technology. Instead, the woes are attributed to poor practices. According to some, one finger should be pointed at certificate authorities, which they say need to do a better job confirming the identity of certificate holders in order to bolster the trust placed in SSL certificates.

“SSL has been burdened with procedural failures, not technical ones. The issue is simple in concept, and complicated in execution: verifying a user's identity can't be done reliably by a machine,” says Bill Horne, who runs William Warren Consulting. “At some point, anyone who is trying to convince web users that their PKI certificate is valid must venture into meatspace and show up before a neutral third party to prove that they--or their company--are entitled to use the name that's on their X.509 PKI certificate.”

Chet Wisniewski, senior security advisor at Sophos, echoes Horne’s sentiments, stating that he doesn’t think that the SSL protocol is broken aside from the fact that it relies on the antiquated model of relying on central CAs.

“The methods they use to verify your identity are a bit of a joke. You can get an SSL certificate for just about anything. For $19, which is what these certs cost, they're domain-validated, which just doesn't mean a lot,” he says. “As far as I'm concerned, having those certs there is better than nothing because it protects you against things like Firesheep. But they should be free and the fact that they say they validate who (the certificate holders) say they are, it’s just horse manure.”

[...]

_____________________________________________________
Did a friend send you this article? Make it your
New Year's Resolution to subscribe to InfoSec News!
http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn

Current thread: