Information Security News mailing list archives
Voice encryption product security evaluation: right criteria for evaluation (it was a marketing campaign)
From: InfoSec News <alerts () infosecnews org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:23:06 -0600 (CST)
Forwarded from: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists (at) infosecurity.ch> Hi all, i don't know how many of you have read "deeply" about the analysis done on http://infosecurityguard.com . I have made a detailed analysis of their initiative and the result is that: - it's most probably a camouflage marketing initiative and not a independent security research - they consider *only* a security context where local device has been compromised (no software can be secured in that case) - they do not consider cryptographic security arguments Below my analysis on this (read it carefully): http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/ Maybe it's interesting, maybe not, but for sure some facts are very relevant! Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) ________________________________________ Did a friend send you this? From now on, be the first to find out! Subscribe to InfoSec News http://www.infosecnews.org
Current thread:
- Voice encryption product security evaluation: right criteria for evaluation (it was a marketing campaign) InfoSec News (Feb 02)