Information Security News mailing list archives

RE: Student arrested for allegedly hacking university computers to derail election


From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 03:50:39 -0500 (CDT)

Forwarded from: Jon Miller <cio.ny () usa net>

I also find it troubling, on additional levels...

That this student chose to use his skills to exploit a university
computer system (not well known for security in general) is troubling.
It wasn't by accident that he did this, and unless he's been living on
another planet for the past couple of years, he knows that we don't
and shouldn't have a sense of humor about such things.

Ethical hacks? By self appointed "deputies of the public trust"?  Let
the punishment fit the crime, I agree with you completely, but define
the crime... If you came home to find such a "deputy" sitting in your
living room who said "I broke in to show you that your door locks &
alarm system is faulty" would you thank him and send him on his way or
call the police? After all, he caused no damage (this time).

________________________
Jon Miller, CISSP, GSEC

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-isn () attrition org [mailto:owner-isn () attrition org] On Behalf
Of InfoSec News
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:38 AM
To: isn () attrition org
Subject: Re: [ISN] Student arrested for allegedly hacking university
computers to derail election

Forwarded from: Dragos Ruiu <dr () kyx net>

I find this troubling.

There is no reason I can see that this should have come in to the
criminal justice system. (drug possession issues aside)

I have seen much more potentially harmful and dangerous school pranks
go virtually ignored during my University career, but since this
involved a computer it seems to have evoked an over-reaction that is
disturbing. There is no reason this prank should not have been dealt
with in the confines of the school's disciplinary system. Surely
negating his university career and chances at a degree is harsh enough
punishment for what was ostensibly a prank (albeit a stupid one) - and
a relatively victimless one at that.

The real fiscal and monetary damages for disturbing a small *student*
election would be trivial at best. At my university with 30k
undergraduate students the budget for student elections was under
$5,000. An 800 vote election cannot be very expensive even in the most
inflated estimates.  There was no fiscal theft, property damage, nor
dangerous liability that could have brought physical injury to anyone,
unlike some cases of computer meddling, which would seem to require
intervention by the criminal law enforcement system.
[JM] ...


-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.


Current thread: